COVID-19 Misinformation = ConVid-1984?

OR … CON-VID-19(84) & the NOT-“Vaccine”

Do we “trust in science.”

How do we know the “science” is not biased,
as it so often is?

Are the so-called “Conspiracy Theories”
actually Conspriacy REALITIES?

[NEW, Latest Updates Coming Soon]

So Far, the “Story” of COVID-19 brings up more questions than it answers. I will not attempt to do a complete or cohesive analysis of this topic. I will however shed some light on less well unknown aspects and give you resources to research “the other side of the story” compared to what government agencies and drug companies are telling you.

Various very intelligent and informed individuals have access to many different aspects of the COVID story and having certainty about what the exact history is, how it came to be, and even what the “virus” really is, is not easy. It was developed in a fairly high degree of secrecy, although there are many documents discussing its development of it going all the way back to at least 2002. … Yet some aspects of it are a bit murky.

The biggest ambiguity I’ve seen is the question as to whether or not the virus was accidentally leaked from the Wuhan Lab is China, or whether it was intentional. The timing of its release, however, is too coincidental with the need of the Chinese Communist Party and the many U.S. parties and entities who wanted / needed to get rid of then-President Donald J. Trump.

Here are some miscellaneous pieces of info, then we’ll try to make sense of it:

In February of 2020, shortly after the idea of a “COVID-19 virus” became popular, Dr. Francis Boyle was interviewed by Alex Jones, founder of Dr. Boyle is a professor & attorney who wrote the United States laws regarding bioterrorism (“medical” research as applied to warfare) during the Reagan Administration. Dr. Boyle is an acknowledged expert on bio-weapon-related laboratory experimentation of animal and human viruses and keeps informed on developments in the field by a comprehensive reading of the relevant medical literature.

When Boyle wrote those laws, the dangers of bio-terror viral research were considered so bad that the more extreme viral research was outlawed, with very severe penalties for pursuing such research. There was even debate on whether the death penalty was appropriate.

During his interview with Alex Jones, Dr. Boyle presented a 2015 paper — a “smoking gun,” if not the gun itself — documenting how the precursors to the COVID-19 virus were being developed at the BSL-4 (bio-safety level 4, meaning the highest level of safety on a scale of 1 to 4) laboratory at Fort Dietrich in North Carolina. Part of the controversial research was whether Gain Of Function could be achieved, making a virus more able to be spread through a human population. Dr. Boyle says there is NO legitimate medical function of such a “turbo-charged” virus; it is only useful as a bio-weapon. 

PLEASE SEE an Extensive Article and Access to the Infowars video at:

Because pursuing such development violated the bioterrorism laws because of the inherent dangers involved, the research project was transferred to the Wuhan, China Bioterrorism Research facility. This was all facilitated, in great part, by Dr. Anthony Fauci. 

Fauci is the highest-paid U.S. government employee, making more money than even the President of the United States. Fauci had also been deeply involved with AIDS research and has been accused of killing a lot of people due to the recommended use of AZT to treat AIDS. AZT was highly profitable but was considered by many to be more deadly than AIDS itself.

And of course, anyone who attempted to promote a less toxic method to treat AIDS was ridiculed by various means. Just like those physicians who attempted to apply 1.) hydroxychloroquine, and 2.) Ivermectin, to treat early-stage COVID have been severely attacked for doing so. Even licensed medical doctors were threatened with loss of their medical licenses if they attempted to treat their patients with them, or nutritional modalities to strengthen the immune system such as 3.) Vitamins D, C, Zinc, and 4.) Quercetin.

(Hundreds of doctors treated thousands of patients with various combinations of those four categories of remedy with near ZERO death rates, and usually recovering within days, usually less than a week.) All of those elements are VERY inexpensive to obtain and administer.

This leads to the “conspiracy theory” that the injectable drugs being developed & recommended for emergency use, and falsely called “vaccines,” were VERY profitable to the drug manufacturers. And, the laws say an untested drug cannot be classified as “emergency use” unless there are NO OTHER remedies available. That is why they had to have the 4 times mentioned above suppressed or declared “untested” and therefore not appropriate for treating COVID.

There was no way the various COVID “not-vaccines” being rushed through the development process could have undergone long-term studies, so they could not be ruled safe OR effective. So they needed emergency status. The drug companies got paid a few billion dollars, much of it government, taxpayer’s money, to administer the program.

And of course, we now know that the CDC & FDA’s VAERS (vaccine adverse event reporting system) has reported more deaths from the “vaccine” than ALL other vaccines ever used in American medicine combined.

Once the virus was transferred to Wuhan, the virologists there continued the development of the virus, which actually might only exist as a computer simulation. In fact, several very informed and trained medical researchers say the alleged COVID-19 “virus” has never actually been isolated, although the so-called “vaccine” (which is not actually a vaccine, but a genetic modification agent, and is only a more virulent version of influenza.

Now, the background of COVID-19 and the not-vaccine get murky. Way back in 2010 (yes, about 12 YEARS ago), the Rockefeller Foundation produced a paper projecting a future event:

From Rockefeller Foundation’s “Lockstep” Report
— Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development

Published in May 2010, this report, beginning on page 18, provides a scenario strikingly similar to what we are experiencing today:

“In 2012 [yes, off by a decade, but WAIT …], the pandemic the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese [please replace ”geese” with “bats” ~DSL] — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults.

The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism & breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. …

“The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders.

However, a few countries did fare better— China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens [please notice the praise for China! ~DSL], as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery. …

“China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.

Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”

WOW! Isn’t it amazing how close they called it? It’s almost like someone was writing a … PLAN!

(In case you were wondering why some people are calling it a “Plan-demic,” now you know.

And another strange thing is Dr. Anthony Fauci, in a talk in front of a group in 2017, announced, on video, said “there is no doubt in anyone’s mind” the Trump Admin was definitely going to experience a “surprise outbreak,” a “challenge” or pandemic of some sort.

If he knew that, which he said he did, WHY did he not say anything to pre-pare until it got going? He said we needed “to involve the community” to solve the problem. WHY was he not waving the flag well in advance? …

How responsible & responsive to the needs of The People was THAT?

The hardest thing for many people to get their mind around is much of this COVID thing comes from people who are hard-core believers in World DE-Population. They have openly stated world population needs to be reduced by as much 80 to 90%.  That is well over 6 Billion People need to be terminated. And they have on many occasions suggested a virus was necessary to accomplish the goal.

And some of these people are the same people, or the next generation, who were hard-core eugenicists back in the early 1900s, when people were sterilized because they were “unfit” humans. … Useless Eaters as they were called. But the idea was to perfect the human race by culling out the undesirables.

Now, many lawsuits have been filed regarding COVID-19, some of them challenging the very existence of the virus, because it has never been isolated. Or if it has, it is unavailable for researchers to get access. But if they are doing diagnostic tests on people, they usually have to have samples of the virus to do the laboratory comparisons. And the test they are using, the PCR test, is unreliable.

The inventor of the test, Dr Kary B. Mullis (now deceased) said the PCR test should not be used for diagnosing of disease. He invented ti for other research purposes. And, the PCR test is considered to have a 50 to 90% false positive testing rate. This means the allegedly very high number of “COVID-19 cases” is exaggerated to the extreme.

We also know many hospitals and clinics were given extra money if a patient death was considered to be COVID-19 related. This led many physicians to declare death to be COVID-related even though the patient obviously had other complications that were more likely the cause of death.

COVID-19 (I call it CON-VID-19(84) — Supporting Documents for Ohio Lawsuit of:
Ohio Stands Up! and Kristen Beckman, ) Plaintiffs, VS. The United States Department of Health & ) Human Services, Center for Disease Control ) (CDC), Secretary Norris Cochran, Director ) Rochelle Walensky, The National Center for ) Health Statistics (NCHS), Director Brian C. ) Moyer, and John and/or Jane Doe[s] 1-20, ) ) Defendants. … LINK: a01495_25a44d11ced94cc8b3c173e05303b9e0.pdf

This Lawsuit presents extensive evidence that medical statistics from the government regarding COVID-19 have been substantially misleading. Meaning COVID-19 was only marginally more dangerous than influenza. Law suit prepared by Attorney Thomas Renz at:

Lawsuit is at LINK:

• Physical Lockdowns and Restriction of mobility 

• Mask mandates when not one double-blind study shows they prevent virus transmittal

• Suppression of therapeutics with a strong track record of eliminating COVID symptoms within DAYS

• Looming threats of a requirement of taking the “vaccine” against one’s will

• Being put on a “non-essential” list, reducing or eliminating one’s income

Kerry B. Mullis, the inventor (now deceased) of the PCR test, used for (allegedly) “detecting COVID-19,” said the PCR test should NOT be used for diagnosis of medical conditions such as COVID-19. The test is known to have 50 to 90% false positives.

Dr. Robert Malone, MD, the inventor of mRNA Gene therapy, the basis for the Moderna and Pfizer versions of the “vaccine,” said the entire way the government backed, Big Pharma approach is all wrong. There’s not been enough long-term testing (which takes years), there is too much censorship of competing ideas, the true risks are unknown or being covered up. Quoting a Tweet of his: “bioethics require full risk disclosure and free choice. … Neither of these are being met. and We do not know all the risks yet.”

Even the CDC admits the mortality rate of COVID is around .3 percent.

Dr. David Martin:

Dr. Martin;‘s Extensive Research on the background of COVID-19 and the pseudo-“vaccine.”

There are a number of Great Videos with VERY interesting & well researched information:

I use this as my Search Engine:

Type or Copy / Paste This in the Search Box:

dr david martin covid-19

Other Books on COVID-19:

Covid-19 And The Global Predators: We Are The Prey

Peter R Breggin MD Ginger Ross Breggin

Breggin, Peter; Breggin, Ginger. COVID-19 and the Global Predators
Lake Edge Press. Kindle Edition.

The Truth About COVID-19:
Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal
Dr. Joseph Mercola Ronnie Cummins
Chelsea Green Publishing. Kindle Edition.